<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://themua.org/collections/items/show/1673">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 15 chair Craig Forrest.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The legal framework for the protection of the underwater cultural heritage has gained momentum throughout the Asia-Pacific with a number of States turning their attention to this issue. For some this is due to concerns raised though specific incidents that have damaged or destroyed the underwater cultural heritage or the information that could be gleaned from its excavation, whilst for others, it follows from consideration being given to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. <br />
This session considers the Legal Framework for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage in a number of Asia-Pacific states. The objectives of session are to explore the various national approaches and to seek aspects of commonality and uniformity that provide frameworks for other state that have not yet addressed the issue. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Craig Forrest ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/12/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://themua.org/collections/items/show/1658">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Chinese Perspective on the International Legal Scheme for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[With 18,000 km of coastline and plentiful streams and rivers, China has an extensive underwater cultural heritage (UCH), which preserves Chinese history and maritime civilization under the ocean as a kind of â€œtime capsuleâ€. After 20-years of development of underwater archaeology and the protection of UCH, China has set up a brand-new national protection system. This contribution first discusses the new development of the Chinese UCH legal system in the 21th century in three aspects: legal subject, legal object and legal content. Further it discussed the tremendous challenges faced by the Chinese legal system. Meanwhile, since its entry into force in 2009, the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (UNESCO 2001 Convention) has been gradually approved by more and more influential States who hold various and abundant UCH items. Part two explains the UNESCO 2001 Convention as the International Cooperation Scheme for Protection of UCH. Part three examines, from the Chinese perspective, the advantages and obstacles for a State that ratifies the UNESCO 2001 Convention. There is a final conclusion that argues that through the UNESCO 2001 Convention diverse national legal protection systems of the UCH have converged into an international cooperation legal instrument.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Liu Lina, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/20/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://themua.org/collections/items/show/1657">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[New approach to protect the underwater cultural heritage in Sri Lanka]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In 2001 the Minister of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Development passed a bill in the Parliament of Sri Lanka entitled the â€œLongâ€“Term Management of Maritime Wrecks and Underwater Cultural Heritage of Sri Lankaâ€.. A committee, known as the Inter Ministerial Committee chaired by the Secretary of the Ministry of Fisheries, was formed to give effect to the bill. Four general meetings have been held and many important decisions have been taken, including stopping salvage and destroying wrecks. This is a very important step towards protecting of the UCH in Sri Lanka. Apart from this, the draft amendment for the Antiquity Ordinance no 9, 1940; brought into effect in 2012, provides that any vessels that had run aground more than one hundred years ago, or built more than one hundred years ago, shall be considered underwater cultural heritage. An amendment brought in 1998 for the same ordinance had extended the meaning by adding â€œfound in the Sri Lankan watersâ€, bringing greater protection for UCH in Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan Navy is assisting by giving coverage for protection as a whole and it was strengthened with the request of the Director General of Archaeology for stopping any attempt to destroy UCH in our waters. A newly formed department for protecting coastal zones is well educated for the prevention of any harmful activity on UCH. There are several other rules and regulations related to the protection of UCH in Sri Lanka, which will be covered in this paper.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Sanath Karunarathna, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/20/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://themua.org/collections/items/show/1656">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Protecting the Underwater Cultural Heritage<br />
in the waters surrounding Hong Kong]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Since its colonial founding in 1841 Hong Kong has been a vibrant centre for international trade and commerce. Its strategic location at the head of the Pearl River made it a perfect location for maritime trade. Before this the waters surrounding Hong Kongâ€™s 200 plus islands were the notorious hideouts of pirates seeking to plunder the rich merchant vessels trading between China and its South East Asian neighbours. The waters around Hong Kong are only now being fully explored for their cultural heritage. Professionals and amateurs are seeking the resting places of infamous pirate wrecks and the wrecks of their victims. Harbor developments and sea fortifications are being examined. However, the continued expansion of Hong Kong as a trading centre and the shortage of land for development places many underwater areas that may have significant heritage information at risk. Developments and land reclamation in the world famous Victoria Harbor have raised concerns locally and internationally. The building and expansion of the Chek Lap Kok Airport and the building of the Hong Kong-Macau-Zhuhai Bridge have given archaeologists opportunity to discover evidence of Hong Kongâ€™s underwater cultural heritage but have also raised concerns regarding its damage and destruction. This paper considers the protection Hong Kongâ€™s laws provide for the underwater cultural heritage in the face of threats from building projects, reclamation, increased traffic in established sea routes and the establishment of new commercial sea routes.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Steven Gallagher, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/20/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://themua.org/collections/items/show/1655">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Model Law to Implement the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage and its Possible Application in Plural Legal Regimes in Pacific Small Islands States: A Case study of Solomon Islands]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A strategy for promoting the adoption of the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, is the adoption of a Model Law; one that also promotes uniformity, consistency and ease of use. This, however, is a challenge in the Pacific. Solomon Islands, for example, like most Pacific island nations, has a plural legal regime. That is, customary law operates in conjunction with the common law, a legacy of Solomon Islandsâ€™ colonial past. Legal pluralism raises significant difficulties for the protection and management of cultural heritage, and is especially challenging when the maritime areas beyond the low water mark are involved. This paper considers the barriers to protection of underwater cultural heritage raised by legal pluralism and the further difficulties encountered when considering Solomon Islandâ€™s possible ratification on the 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. It considers whether a Model Law might be a useful tool in this endeavour.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Craig Forrest]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Corrin, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/20/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
